WEBVTT 1 00:00:00.237 --> 00:00:03.737 (gentle orchestral music) 2 00:00:19.213 --> 00:00:21.665 (upbeat violin music) 3 00:00:21.665 --> 00:00:25.230 - The Department of State has over 250 culturally 4 00:00:25.230 --> 00:00:27.720 significant properties around the world 5 00:00:27.720 --> 00:00:31.200 as well as over 16,000 heritage assets 6 00:00:31.200 --> 00:00:33.390 located within diplomatic facilities 7 00:00:33.390 --> 00:00:36.360 at over 200 diplomatic posts around the world. 8 00:00:36.360 --> 00:00:39.930 The Office of Cultural Heritage was established in 2015 9 00:00:39.930 --> 00:00:42.900 essentially to conduct a stewardship program 10 00:00:42.900 --> 00:00:45.120 for the care of the Department of State's 11 00:00:45.120 --> 00:00:47.850 culturally significant properties and heritage assets. 12 00:00:47.850 --> 00:00:49.770 - As stewards of these objects 13 00:00:49.770 --> 00:00:52.650 we have a role to conserve them, 14 00:00:52.650 --> 00:00:54.270 so their conservation, 15 00:00:54.270 --> 00:00:57.660 but we now have an expanding role to communicate about them 16 00:00:57.660 --> 00:00:59.940 and to educate people. 17 00:00:59.940 --> 00:01:01.710 - Despite the diversity 18 00:01:01.710 --> 00:01:03.690 of the Department of State's Heritage Collection, 19 00:01:03.690 --> 00:01:05.430 we don't actually have 20 00:01:05.430 --> 00:01:07.443 very many paintings in the collection. 21 00:01:08.280 --> 00:01:11.610 There is, however, one very prominent painting. 22 00:01:11.610 --> 00:01:15.570 It hangs in the ambassador's residence in Paris. 23 00:01:15.570 --> 00:01:18.630 It is a full length portrait of George Washington 24 00:01:18.630 --> 00:01:20.400 after the Battle of Princeton, 25 00:01:20.400 --> 00:01:23.490 attributed to Charles Willson Peale. 26 00:01:23.490 --> 00:01:26.430 This painting was introduced to me by my colleagues 27 00:01:26.430 --> 00:01:28.410 at the Office of Cultural Heritage. 28 00:01:28.410 --> 00:01:31.830 It had been identified as a priority for conservation 29 00:01:31.830 --> 00:01:33.900 and some preliminary research had been conducted 30 00:01:33.900 --> 00:01:35.670 about its history and provenance. 31 00:01:35.670 --> 00:01:37.500 The Paris portrait was donated 32 00:01:37.500 --> 00:01:42.500 by Caroline Ryan Foulke in 1989 following her death in 1987. 33 00:01:42.840 --> 00:01:44.880 Mrs. Foulke refers to the painting 34 00:01:44.880 --> 00:01:47.550 as the Laurens-Albemarle portrait. 35 00:01:47.550 --> 00:01:51.180 Yet we didn't have sufficient documentation in our records 36 00:01:51.180 --> 00:01:53.850 to confirm that it was in fact that picture. 37 00:01:53.850 --> 00:01:57.060 - And we learned that it had an exceptional story. 38 00:01:57.060 --> 00:01:59.130 And I think one of the key things 39 00:01:59.130 --> 00:02:02.250 that really led us to realize how important this project is, 40 00:02:02.250 --> 00:02:07.000 is that the portrait that we think we have 41 00:02:08.010 --> 00:02:12.870 had actually been out of the academic eye for over 60 years. 42 00:02:12.870 --> 00:02:16.890 And if we could help scholars, Peale scholars, 43 00:02:16.890 --> 00:02:19.800 and art history scholars to know more 44 00:02:19.800 --> 00:02:22.770 and also just to know that this portrait is in good hands 45 00:02:22.770 --> 00:02:24.270 and is being properly cared for, 46 00:02:24.270 --> 00:02:26.220 I mean that would be a win-win right there. 47 00:02:26.220 --> 00:02:28.080 - There was tremendous enthusiasm 48 00:02:28.080 --> 00:02:30.270 from the art historical community 49 00:02:30.270 --> 00:02:33.270 specifically about the possibility that it could be 50 00:02:33.270 --> 00:02:35.550 the Laurens-Albemarle portrait. 51 00:02:35.550 --> 00:02:38.040 Knowing that the painting required conservation 52 00:02:38.040 --> 00:02:41.160 the Office of Cultural Heritage wanted to embark on a study 53 00:02:41.160 --> 00:02:43.470 in advance of that to inform treatment. 54 00:02:43.470 --> 00:02:46.710 I was in search of a Peale scholar 55 00:02:46.710 --> 00:02:50.193 as well as a conservator with expertise in authentication. 56 00:02:51.060 --> 00:02:52.740 - I first became involved in this project 57 00:02:52.740 --> 00:02:55.050 through a phone call from Lauren Hall 58 00:02:55.050 --> 00:02:57.637 who said to me, most surprisingly, 59 00:02:57.637 --> 00:03:00.620 "Would you like to go to Paris to look at a picture?" 60 00:03:00.620 --> 00:03:01.741 (Carol chuckles) 61 00:03:01.741 --> 00:03:03.120 I thought it was a joke. 62 00:03:03.120 --> 00:03:05.970 Provenance is really critical here 63 00:03:05.970 --> 00:03:09.870 because the picture sort of had a disappearing life. 64 00:03:09.870 --> 00:03:12.360 Success is putting the two pieces together 65 00:03:12.360 --> 00:03:14.880 of the beginning of the story and the end of the story. 66 00:03:14.880 --> 00:03:16.080 The end of the story is 67 00:03:16.080 --> 00:03:19.140 it's coming to the embassy here in Paris, 68 00:03:19.140 --> 00:03:20.940 and I decided that what I needed to do 69 00:03:20.940 --> 00:03:23.760 was construct a timeline and put down what I knew. 70 00:03:23.760 --> 00:03:27.600 And so this timeline turned into something 71 00:03:27.600 --> 00:03:29.403 that was constantly edited. 72 00:03:31.149 --> 00:03:33.930 (light orchestral music) 73 00:03:33.930 --> 00:03:36.000 It was commissioned by Henry Laurens. 74 00:03:36.000 --> 00:03:39.420 It leaves Philadelphia in 1780 with Henry Laurens 75 00:03:39.420 --> 00:03:41.790 who is going to the Netherlands to raise money. 76 00:03:41.790 --> 00:03:44.130 So this picture is taken by Henry, 77 00:03:44.130 --> 00:03:46.080 who probably commissions it privately, 78 00:03:46.080 --> 00:03:49.170 but decides to take it as a diplomatic gift 79 00:03:49.170 --> 00:03:50.070 to the Netherlands. 80 00:03:50.070 --> 00:03:51.540 So we have a terminus date 81 00:03:51.540 --> 00:03:53.790 of when it's on the ship leaving Philadelphia. 82 00:03:53.790 --> 00:03:56.220 So that's the beginning of its sort of life. 83 00:03:56.220 --> 00:03:58.590 Then it goes, starting across the Atlantic, 84 00:03:58.590 --> 00:04:01.740 it gets captured by British Captain Keppel 85 00:04:01.740 --> 00:04:05.190 who takes it to his country estate in London. 86 00:04:05.190 --> 00:04:08.310 So George Washington has been captured 87 00:04:08.310 --> 00:04:11.460 and Henry Laurens too was captured 88 00:04:11.460 --> 00:04:13.290 and he was taken to the Tower of London 89 00:04:13.290 --> 00:04:14.590 and locked up for a while. 90 00:04:15.630 --> 00:04:17.820 I had to follow this in the 20th century. 91 00:04:17.820 --> 00:04:20.670 So I'm dealing with an 18th century painting's life 92 00:04:20.670 --> 00:04:21.630 in the 20th century. 93 00:04:21.630 --> 00:04:26.630 The Paris portrait that had been seized by Keppel earlier 94 00:04:26.640 --> 00:04:29.610 and taken to the Albemarle estate was put at auction 95 00:04:29.610 --> 00:04:33.720 by the Lords Albemarle in 1946 at Sotheby's in London. 96 00:04:33.720 --> 00:04:35.850 Was bought by Mr. Davey 97 00:04:35.850 --> 00:04:39.540 and he was working at that time for Knoedler & Company, 98 00:04:39.540 --> 00:04:42.120 and he was intending to take it back to New York, 99 00:04:42.120 --> 00:04:44.670 and in fact had it loaded on board a ship 100 00:04:44.670 --> 00:04:47.520 where he met another New York dealer 101 00:04:47.520 --> 00:04:49.380 who purchased it from him. 102 00:04:49.380 --> 00:04:51.870 So when it docked in New York, 103 00:04:51.870 --> 00:04:56.790 the picture belonged to someone else, Mr. Rousuck. 104 00:04:56.790 --> 00:04:58.020 So I ended up going 105 00:04:58.020 --> 00:05:00.210 and doing a lot of research on Mr. Rousuck. 106 00:05:00.210 --> 00:05:01.260 Who is this man? 107 00:05:01.260 --> 00:05:03.390 He wasn't, to me, a well known person. 108 00:05:03.390 --> 00:05:04.800 He dealt in sporting art 109 00:05:04.800 --> 00:05:07.590 who has a gallery at that point called Scott & Fowles. 110 00:05:07.590 --> 00:05:09.540 And so all those questions, actually, 111 00:05:09.540 --> 00:05:11.460 not even about the picture itself, 112 00:05:11.460 --> 00:05:14.910 but about the personalities involved around the picture. 113 00:05:14.910 --> 00:05:17.520 Did this help develop the chronology? 114 00:05:17.520 --> 00:05:19.530 - Carol's research was incredibly thorough 115 00:05:19.530 --> 00:05:24.150 and it contextualized so many physical pieces of evidence 116 00:05:24.150 --> 00:05:28.770 that we observed over the course of the study. 117 00:05:28.770 --> 00:05:32.220 There were several objectives to the authentication study, 118 00:05:32.220 --> 00:05:36.090 one being that we establish a more complete history 119 00:05:36.090 --> 00:05:38.220 of the portrait in our collection, 120 00:05:38.220 --> 00:05:40.350 as well as to establish comprehensively 121 00:05:40.350 --> 00:05:43.920 the existing condition of the portrait in Paris. 122 00:05:43.920 --> 00:05:46.560 - When I first learned about the project 123 00:05:46.560 --> 00:05:49.450 and that there was a possibility of 124 00:05:50.760 --> 00:05:54.300 analyzing a real Charles Willson Peale portrait 125 00:05:54.300 --> 00:05:56.580 of George Washington, I was so excited. 126 00:05:56.580 --> 00:06:01.110 - A key aspect of this project has been relationships. 127 00:06:01.110 --> 00:06:04.230 We established relationships with a number of institutions 128 00:06:04.230 --> 00:06:06.990 that either had versions of 129 00:06:06.990 --> 00:06:10.050 the "Washington at Princeton" portrait in their collection 130 00:06:10.050 --> 00:06:12.450 or other known Peale works. 131 00:06:12.450 --> 00:06:15.000 - Charles Willson Peale made many copies of his work. 132 00:06:15.000 --> 00:06:17.880 Family members made copies of his work. 133 00:06:17.880 --> 00:06:21.900 But how close these copies are is the critical question. 134 00:06:21.900 --> 00:06:25.050 - Our goal was to develop a baseline 135 00:06:25.050 --> 00:06:26.430 of what those paintings should look like 136 00:06:26.430 --> 00:06:27.810 and how they were made 137 00:06:27.810 --> 00:06:30.900 in order to be able to evaluate the Paris picture 138 00:06:30.900 --> 00:06:32.340 and see if it matched. 139 00:06:32.340 --> 00:06:36.120 - We started comparing the Paris portrait 140 00:06:36.120 --> 00:06:38.430 to the portrait it's based on 141 00:06:38.430 --> 00:06:39.750 which is Charles Willson Peale's 142 00:06:39.750 --> 00:06:42.570 1779 "Washington at Princeton". 143 00:06:42.570 --> 00:06:43.403 That picture, 144 00:06:43.403 --> 00:06:45.600 which is in the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts now, 145 00:06:45.600 --> 00:06:48.150 was commissioned by the Pennsylvania Assembly. 146 00:06:48.150 --> 00:06:50.940 That was our critical, critical picture. 147 00:06:50.940 --> 00:06:53.250 - That painting originally hung 148 00:06:53.250 --> 00:06:55.170 in the Pennsylvania State House, 149 00:06:55.170 --> 00:06:57.480 which is now known as Independence Hall. 150 00:06:57.480 --> 00:07:00.030 Of the "Washington at Princeton" series 151 00:07:00.030 --> 00:07:02.220 this initial painting hanging in PAFA 152 00:07:02.220 --> 00:07:04.860 is the only one that was painted from life. 153 00:07:04.860 --> 00:07:08.740 - One of the most special features about the PAFA portrait 154 00:07:09.660 --> 00:07:13.980 is the compositional changes we were able to see, 155 00:07:13.980 --> 00:07:18.090 which gave us insight into how Peale worked out 156 00:07:18.090 --> 00:07:21.240 the composition that we see today. 157 00:07:21.240 --> 00:07:22.740 He didn't get it right the first time. 158 00:07:22.740 --> 00:07:25.740 He painted George standing in the middle of the portrait. 159 00:07:25.740 --> 00:07:27.240 Some of the angles were wrong. 160 00:07:27.240 --> 00:07:29.190 The hat was in a different location, 161 00:07:29.190 --> 00:07:32.190 and I was able to see that using infrared light, 162 00:07:32.190 --> 00:07:34.890 and it was really exciting 163 00:07:34.890 --> 00:07:37.788 to see something that no one else had seen before, 164 00:07:37.788 --> 00:07:41.430 since maybe Peale himself. 165 00:07:41.430 --> 00:07:43.230 - After our visit to Philadelphia, 166 00:07:43.230 --> 00:07:46.050 the team met in the Washington DC area 167 00:07:46.050 --> 00:07:48.420 and our next visit was to Mount Vernon 168 00:07:48.420 --> 00:07:52.920 where we were able to see their 1780 three quarter version 169 00:07:52.920 --> 00:07:55.620 portrait of "Washington at Princeton". 170 00:07:55.620 --> 00:07:57.420 - I used my same system 171 00:07:57.420 --> 00:08:00.750 that I had developed for the PAFA research. 172 00:08:00.750 --> 00:08:03.840 I did a condition evaluation. 173 00:08:03.840 --> 00:08:08.460 I imaged the painting using visible ultraviolet 174 00:08:08.460 --> 00:08:10.440 and infrared radiation, 175 00:08:10.440 --> 00:08:12.990 and I did elemental analysis with XRF 176 00:08:12.990 --> 00:08:15.150 to learn about the pigs that were present. 177 00:08:15.150 --> 00:08:16.890 And I also had access 178 00:08:16.890 --> 00:08:19.470 to take physical samples from that painting, 179 00:08:19.470 --> 00:08:21.720 which turned out to be extremely useful. 180 00:08:21.720 --> 00:08:24.480 - What we were looking for was similar materials. 181 00:08:24.480 --> 00:08:26.490 We wanted to be able to say yes, 182 00:08:26.490 --> 00:08:28.860 this kind of canvas, this kind of pigment. 183 00:08:28.860 --> 00:08:31.860 And we also were allowed to go to the US Senate 184 00:08:31.860 --> 00:08:33.510 and see their picture. 185 00:08:33.510 --> 00:08:36.690 - The US Senate collection has the second version 186 00:08:36.690 --> 00:08:39.420 of the "Washington at Princeton" portrait 187 00:08:39.420 --> 00:08:40.863 hanging at the US Capitol. 188 00:08:41.910 --> 00:08:43.020 - I brought my same system 189 00:08:43.020 --> 00:08:47.640 and approach to the Senate painting as I did at PAFA 190 00:08:47.640 --> 00:08:48.870 and Mount Vernon. 191 00:08:48.870 --> 00:08:52.320 Again, I looked at the elemental analysis 192 00:08:52.320 --> 00:08:53.820 that I got from the Senate 193 00:08:53.820 --> 00:08:57.180 and I was seeing some distinct similarities. 194 00:08:57.180 --> 00:09:01.800 At this point I had visited a number of Peale paintings 195 00:09:01.800 --> 00:09:04.050 and looked very carefully at them and analyzed them. 196 00:09:04.050 --> 00:09:06.540 And I had a very good understanding 197 00:09:06.540 --> 00:09:09.750 about what one of these paintings should look like 198 00:09:09.750 --> 00:09:11.940 and how it would've been made. 199 00:09:11.940 --> 00:09:16.940 And it was time to take that body of knowledge to Paris 200 00:09:17.400 --> 00:09:20.460 and compare it to the Paris picture. 201 00:09:20.460 --> 00:09:23.670 - The looming question as we departed for Paris 202 00:09:23.670 --> 00:09:27.003 was whether or not our picture is a Peale. 203 00:09:31.080 --> 00:09:35.760 - A couple of days before we went to Paris for the project 204 00:09:35.760 --> 00:09:39.090 Carol Soltis shared with me a photo 205 00:09:39.090 --> 00:09:44.090 she had recently uncovered from a 1946 Sotheby's catalog 206 00:09:44.940 --> 00:09:46.920 that was the last known picture 207 00:09:46.920 --> 00:09:49.470 of the Laurens-Albemarle painting. 208 00:09:49.470 --> 00:09:53.430 - Couldn't tell a lot because it was taken in 1946 209 00:09:53.430 --> 00:09:56.910 and it was just not a high resolution kind of image, 210 00:09:56.910 --> 00:09:58.710 but it looked compatible. 211 00:09:58.710 --> 00:10:00.060 - It looked like an old picture. 212 00:10:00.060 --> 00:10:01.410 It looked grainy. 213 00:10:01.410 --> 00:10:04.020 It looked like there was dust particles 214 00:10:04.020 --> 00:10:06.990 but there were some things that really stood out to me 215 00:10:06.990 --> 00:10:11.130 that looked like features that would only happen to paint. 216 00:10:11.130 --> 00:10:15.540 And in particular, I saw a circular shape 217 00:10:15.540 --> 00:10:17.940 and I thought that looks like something 218 00:10:17.940 --> 00:10:20.010 called impact crackle. 219 00:10:20.010 --> 00:10:23.040 Could just be an optical illusion. 220 00:10:23.040 --> 00:10:25.260 But I made a few notes of things 221 00:10:25.260 --> 00:10:28.050 that I thought could be part of the paint layer 222 00:10:28.050 --> 00:10:30.060 and I made a diagram 223 00:10:30.060 --> 00:10:32.520 and I thought I'm gonna look at the painting 224 00:10:32.520 --> 00:10:35.733 when we get there and see if maybe I can find any of these. 225 00:10:37.230 --> 00:10:42.230 - In 2019, I had the opportunity to see the Paris picture 226 00:10:43.350 --> 00:10:47.190 hanging in the Louis XVI salon at the residence. 227 00:10:47.190 --> 00:10:50.160 - Our "Washington at Princeton" was put up on the wall 228 00:10:50.160 --> 00:10:53.460 in the master's residence when it was loaned 229 00:10:53.460 --> 00:10:55.650 and then later bequeathed to us. 230 00:10:55.650 --> 00:10:57.390 And we were glad that it was on the wall, 231 00:10:57.390 --> 00:10:58.620 but that was basically all the care 232 00:10:58.620 --> 00:10:59.880 that was being taken at that time. 233 00:10:59.880 --> 00:11:00.713 The cultural heritage program 234 00:11:00.713 --> 00:11:02.220 didn't even exist at that time. 235 00:11:02.220 --> 00:11:04.440 - My initial impression was that 236 00:11:04.440 --> 00:11:06.180 there had been heavy interventions. 237 00:11:06.180 --> 00:11:08.520 - The life of the Paris picture, 238 00:11:08.520 --> 00:11:12.510 it gave us pause because of its condition. 239 00:11:12.510 --> 00:11:15.240 - When Carol and I walked in there and looked at it, 240 00:11:15.240 --> 00:11:19.530 we both, we looked at each other and said, oh, thank God. 241 00:11:19.530 --> 00:11:22.710 This thing looks more like the other Peale portraits 242 00:11:22.710 --> 00:11:24.840 than we thought it was going to. 243 00:11:24.840 --> 00:11:29.430 Then I pull out my diagram and the 1946 picture 244 00:11:29.430 --> 00:11:32.040 and I start looking at the painting. 245 00:11:32.040 --> 00:11:34.980 And in particular I wanted to look for 246 00:11:34.980 --> 00:11:37.150 that concentric circles 247 00:11:38.370 --> 00:11:40.110 and I immediately saw it. 248 00:11:40.110 --> 00:11:42.750 And it was in exactly the same place, 249 00:11:42.750 --> 00:11:46.350 and I thought we are really onto something here. 250 00:11:46.350 --> 00:11:47.490 - The painting was deinstalled. 251 00:11:47.490 --> 00:11:49.770 It was taken off of the wall. 252 00:11:49.770 --> 00:11:52.230 The dust cover was removed from the back, 253 00:11:52.230 --> 00:11:54.540 and that gave us in-person access 254 00:11:54.540 --> 00:11:57.210 to the back of the picture. 255 00:11:57.210 --> 00:12:00.930 There are a number of labels on the back of the picture, 256 00:12:00.930 --> 00:12:05.160 and we were each trying to take pictures of them 257 00:12:05.160 --> 00:12:05.993 and interpret them. 258 00:12:05.993 --> 00:12:07.500 Some were in better condition than others. 259 00:12:07.500 --> 00:12:10.080 Some were less legible, some were more legible. 260 00:12:10.080 --> 00:12:13.680 And I remember looking down, I was next to Carol, 261 00:12:13.680 --> 00:12:14.700 I remember looking down 262 00:12:14.700 --> 00:12:18.030 and I said Scott & Fowles and she said, "Scott & Fowles". 263 00:12:18.030 --> 00:12:21.930 - Finding the label for Scott & Fowles gallery in New York 264 00:12:21.930 --> 00:12:22.763 was perfect. 265 00:12:22.763 --> 00:12:27.510 - This gallery was E.J. Rousuck's gallery in New York. 266 00:12:27.510 --> 00:12:32.340 E.J. Rousuck is the last documented owner 267 00:12:32.340 --> 00:12:34.800 of the Laurens-Albemarle portrait. 268 00:12:34.800 --> 00:12:37.140 So despite the fact that we don't have 269 00:12:37.140 --> 00:12:40.424 definitive documentation of Mrs. Foulke's 270 00:12:40.424 --> 00:12:43.500 purchase of the painting from Rousuck 271 00:12:43.500 --> 00:12:45.810 we now have this physical evidence 272 00:12:45.810 --> 00:12:48.600 that the painting was in his possession. 273 00:12:48.600 --> 00:12:53.600 - Finding the label alone answers a major problem. 274 00:12:53.940 --> 00:12:55.290 It fills in a gap, 275 00:12:55.290 --> 00:12:59.610 and it's really valuable for the provenance research 276 00:12:59.610 --> 00:13:03.960 but it is just as important to have material evidence. 277 00:13:03.960 --> 00:13:04.890 - The art historical 278 00:13:04.890 --> 00:13:08.340 and technical research are complimentary. 279 00:13:08.340 --> 00:13:11.310 So even though we had this piece of evidence 280 00:13:11.310 --> 00:13:13.020 the study wasn't complete. 281 00:13:13.020 --> 00:13:15.780 Emily still needed to conduct her work. 282 00:13:15.780 --> 00:13:17.730 - She's gonna give us real science 283 00:13:17.730 --> 00:13:21.360 to go together with the more speculative kinds of research 284 00:13:21.360 --> 00:13:22.890 than an academic does. 285 00:13:22.890 --> 00:13:25.020 - The more I looked at the portrait in person 286 00:13:25.020 --> 00:13:28.470 the more I felt that it was by Peale. 287 00:13:28.470 --> 00:13:29.910 That's the truth. 288 00:13:29.910 --> 00:13:33.720 But that is nothing more than a feeling 289 00:13:33.720 --> 00:13:38.720 because the work that I do is about material evidence. 290 00:13:38.910 --> 00:13:41.250 You must remain objective 291 00:13:41.250 --> 00:13:42.930 no matter how much I want it to be real, 292 00:13:42.930 --> 00:13:45.183 because believe me, I wanted it to be real. 293 00:13:46.200 --> 00:13:47.700 I needed the evidence. 294 00:13:47.700 --> 00:13:48.780 Carol did too. 295 00:13:48.780 --> 00:13:52.860 We learned so much about the materials 296 00:13:52.860 --> 00:13:55.770 and techniques of Charles Willson Peale. 297 00:13:55.770 --> 00:13:58.590 I mean, we have an incredible amount of data 298 00:13:58.590 --> 00:14:03.590 that all confirms along with my opinion and Carol's opinion, 299 00:14:04.350 --> 00:14:05.790 that the painting is real. 300 00:14:05.790 --> 00:14:08.590 The Paris portrait was painted by Charles Willson Peale. 301 00:14:09.969 --> 00:14:12.150 (Carol chuckles) 302 00:14:12.150 --> 00:14:14.970 - It's very good news, from everybody. 303 00:14:14.970 --> 00:14:16.050 - You know, the significance of this 304 00:14:16.050 --> 00:14:18.540 really can't be overstated. 305 00:14:18.540 --> 00:14:22.710 This painting has lived this incredibly dramatic life. 306 00:14:22.710 --> 00:14:24.900 It was essentially lost to history. 307 00:14:24.900 --> 00:14:26.160 Through the course of this study 308 00:14:26.160 --> 00:14:28.590 we've not only relocated this picture 309 00:14:28.590 --> 00:14:31.020 but we've also contributed significantly 310 00:14:31.020 --> 00:14:35.400 to the greater understanding of this artist and his work. 311 00:14:35.400 --> 00:14:39.600 - There's gonna be a vast body of new information about 312 00:14:39.600 --> 00:14:41.940 one of America's most important painters. 313 00:14:41.940 --> 00:14:42.813 - I think, 314 00:14:43.650 --> 00:14:48.090 well, I'm very relieved that this has all come together. 315 00:14:48.090 --> 00:14:52.710 That we've been able to find information that's substantive. 316 00:14:52.710 --> 00:14:56.280 - I'll never forget the great enthusiasm 317 00:14:56.280 --> 00:14:58.350 as we all came together at the end of the project. 318 00:14:58.350 --> 00:15:01.470 Everyone felt that they had done something good. 319 00:15:01.470 --> 00:15:04.650 That they had participated in something that had value. 320 00:15:04.650 --> 00:15:08.730 - The discovery of a formerly lost Peale portrait 321 00:15:08.730 --> 00:15:12.480 is really the discovery of a national treasure. 322 00:15:12.480 --> 00:15:16.920 - Projects like this really speak to the mission 323 00:15:16.920 --> 00:15:18.930 of the Office of Cultural Heritage 324 00:15:18.930 --> 00:15:22.530 and why the Department of State established our office 325 00:15:22.530 --> 00:15:23.820 to begin with. 326 00:15:23.820 --> 00:15:28.820 And that is to promote the preservation of American history, 327 00:15:29.100 --> 00:15:30.840 diplomatic history 328 00:15:30.840 --> 00:15:33.617 and the cultural patrimony of host nations abroad. 329 00:15:35.155 --> 00:15:38.655 (gentle orchestral music)